Singer vs Regan Tom Rybak Phil 340-01 2000-02-03 Singer vs. Regan Despite their rather polar philosophical foundations, both philosophers arrive at basically the logical conclusions. Singer takes a utilitarian approach, while Regan takes a deontological rights and constitutional value position. In the end they both take a position of vegetarianism and advocated banning animal experimentation and sport hunting. In an exchange of letters in the April 25, 1985 issue of The New York follow-up of Books, Regan writes: Singer and I have been independently applying and developing bouncing different ethical theories to ...
the treatment of non-human animals. He continues that it is difficult to puff out the radical moral difference between Singers utilitarianism and the rights view. At the end of Singers reply to Regan, Singer mentions: The practical value of Regans hold back (All the dwell Therein) lies in its attack on our social practices of employment animals as research tools and a...If you want to get a suitable essay, order it on our website:
OrderCustomPaper.comIf you want to get a full essay, visit our page:
write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment